Comment by psychoslave

Given the initial instruction to not take into consideration any obvious common sense, I expected questions to scale up to "everything is a vehicle of some information, so the parc should be put into absolute unmoving zone to make the rule strictly operate", which is of course beyond human possibilities.

The point that the author try to draw about moderation and underspecifications are interesting, but to my mind the framing is not giving a relevant ground to think about it. The author say the goal was to do a better job at this than some previous approachs, which is a effort I salute, though to my mind it doesn't land there yet.