Comment by qup
2 years ago
Since you're already not even close to on-topic, I just want to say that people on the internet commenting about "how they misread the title" are some of the worst kind of comments.
Titles could mean all kinds of various, new things if you substituted meaningful words for other meaningful words. Or in this case, acronyms hiding several words at a time.
The final result of your comment is that apparently you're critiquing LLMs in a thread that has literally nothing to do with them, and seemingly trying to talk about them instead.
I thought it was funny. They had an experience that amused them and they shared it. Not everything has to be to your personal tastes.
If you think that's one of the worst kind of internet comments, you might want to recalibrate a bit. I have a variety of things from my anti-abuse work that I'd be happy to send you.
If you do anti-abuse work, maybe you're the one with a wonky calibration. No offense intended, I appreciate your work.
I live on an Internet where I mainly don't have to see any abuse, thanks to moderation and algorithms and probably good folks like yourself.
Anyway, I think you're missing my point. Look around, here in situ on HN, and compare it to even an average quality comment.
Your theory is that because I have seen abusive content, my sense of humor is now so broken that the things I find funny are objectively bad? That makes no sense at all.
Also, it's wild to see that somebody who's been using this site about 4% of the time I have telling me that I just don't get the context.
Sure, bub. Your personal preferences just happen to be objectively correct, and mine are due to my ignorance and brokenness. Whatever you say.
2 replies →
it works better on reddit with millions of users, there are enough me-toos to make these comments well received by those people.
I also originally misread the title.