← Back to context

Comment by nwienert

2 years ago

Why is it sad? I truly don’t get it, people on HN will say they are somewhat libertarian, pro decentralization, anti corporate oligopolies, but then use their dying breath to say “crypto has no use case”. Yet while AI took nearly 70 years to find its footing, in just 10 years crypto (currencies) has already found inroads into many areas as a nascent technology that has massive potential to solve some of our biggest problems.

I truly think it’s one of those cases where the “wrong/dumb” people jumped onto it (alongside scammers) and so it became poisoned to the right/smart ones. But we should be way better than that! Is it really so hard for people to separate good from bad?

It absolutely bowls me over to see this lack of ability to discuss it carefully around here so consistently. So many potential amazing conversations totally shunted by the absolute need to turn it tribal.

> Is it really so hard for people to separate good from bad?

If you mean "HN people", then probably no; but if you mean more generalized "people", then definitely yes. Unfortunately, your customers are much more likely from the latter group.

Also, being in a sad state doesn't really mean it "has no use case", right?

  • Not understanding what you're saying here. If anything HN has less able to separate good from bad at least on this topic imo, and I wasn't claiming the direct parent posted said exactly it has no use case, but still even that they had to couch any slight mention of utility with being a "sad, sad state" implies they don't like it and know it isn't liked here.