← Back to context Comment by SideburnsOfDoom 15 years ago Falsely asserting copyright over bits of nature is OK for you then? 2 comments SideburnsOfDoom Reply icebraining 15 years ago That was Rumblefish, not Youtube. Youtube was a victim of that, since they could've made more money by simply putting the ads and not sharing them with Rumblefish. SideburnsOfDoom 15 years ago And we're back here: http://news.ycombinator.org/item?id=3659864
icebraining 15 years ago That was Rumblefish, not Youtube. Youtube was a victim of that, since they could've made more money by simply putting the ads and not sharing them with Rumblefish. SideburnsOfDoom 15 years ago And we're back here: http://news.ycombinator.org/item?id=3659864
That was Rumblefish, not Youtube. Youtube was a victim of that, since they could've made more money by simply putting the ads and not sharing them with Rumblefish.
And we're back here: http://news.ycombinator.org/item?id=3659864