Comment by DHPersonal
2 years ago
It certainly could be the truth, but I’m not convinced. An outside agent wanting to destroy dissidence by massively overpaying for Twitter and then running it into the ground seems like it would be inviting a replacement. Wouldn’t it be better to buy it and run it efficiently?
The Saudis already owned Twitter shares, and Musk allowed them to keep their shares through the transaction.
Saudis didn't "buy" shares during the whole event last year. They just kept the shares they already owned.