Comment by abecedarius
3 years ago
The requirement to test for efficacy and not just safety was only added in response to Thalidomide (which disaster had nothing to do with testing for efficacy). So what you're asking for is very not radical.
3 years ago
The requirement to test for efficacy and not just safety was only added in response to Thalidomide (which disaster had nothing to do with testing for efficacy). So what you're asking for is very not radical.
> So what you're asking for is very not radical.
Shame. Radical seems to be all the rage these days.
Maybe I can brand it as radically conventional.