← Back to context

Comment by CogitoCogito

3 years ago

Drug policy is larger than this single man. There are trade offs with different approaches here. “There is literally nothing to lose” is simply false. Restrictions against selling whatever to dying patients is because people _will_ take advantage of them and sell snake oil. If you’re okay with that, why not just let people steal from those terminally ill?

My dad recently died. There are always new treatments being studied and some day one of those treatments might actually be able to cure people with the same disease. That day didn’t come early enough for my dad. That sucks but it doesn’t change the fact that drug policy is made for society as a whole and not only for my dad. This isn’t some conspiracy where a cold bureaucracy is letting people die. Sometimes your luck just runs out.

It literally is a conspiracy where a cold bureaucracy is letting people die. That is exactly what is happening.

You appear to think that it is worth letting people die to avoid quack doctors being able to sell them snake oil. I prefer to leave it up to the patient to decide. They are the ones with skin in the game.