Comment by defrost
2 years ago
That'd be the way that you read it, if they were another Alexandra Elbakyan (or Joanna Rutkowska, or Stephanie Wehner, or ... ) then they clearly wouldn't be a King among Men.
Just as I wrote.
2 years ago
That'd be the way that you read it, if they were another Alexandra Elbakyan (or Joanna Rutkowska, or Stephanie Wehner, or ... ) then they clearly wouldn't be a King among Men.
Just as I wrote.
The issue is more that your comment can be seen as a respond to the /last/ sentence of the original post.
Only to those unaware of who Alexandra Elbakyan is or to those that chose not to investigate.
For those aware the juxtaposition twixt { King of Men } | { Woman who created massive scientific paper archive } tends to dominate.
But sure, not everybody reads things the same way.
No, it is due to the way you phrased the question.
1 reply →
It reads to me same as xereeto said. That's why I asked. Maybe think about that? Do you have some difficulty in interactions?
> Do you have some difficulty in interactions?
No.
I do have 40+ years of observing commenters on internet forums assuming unknowns are male by default.
Maybe think about that?
Well, one of those you mentioned would.