← Back to context Comment by sschueller 3 years ago 1024 x 1024 instead of 512 x 512. 3 comments sschueller Reply Taek 3 years ago XL more likely refers to the parameter count, which is 3 billion instead of <1 billion not2b 3 years ago No, I think it is mainly because it's optimized for 1024 x 1024 images, rather than 512 x 512 as the previous version was. Our_Benefactors 3 years ago It’s both. More pixel space and more parameters.
Taek 3 years ago XL more likely refers to the parameter count, which is 3 billion instead of <1 billion not2b 3 years ago No, I think it is mainly because it's optimized for 1024 x 1024 images, rather than 512 x 512 as the previous version was. Our_Benefactors 3 years ago It’s both. More pixel space and more parameters.
not2b 3 years ago No, I think it is mainly because it's optimized for 1024 x 1024 images, rather than 512 x 512 as the previous version was. Our_Benefactors 3 years ago It’s both. More pixel space and more parameters.
XL more likely refers to the parameter count, which is 3 billion instead of <1 billion
No, I think it is mainly because it's optimized for 1024 x 1024 images, rather than 512 x 512 as the previous version was.
It’s both. More pixel space and more parameters.