something-you-know auth is generally less work than something-you-have auth, since you need to ensure you always have the key handy whenever you would want to log on.
When I started reading this sentence I thought you had them backwards because I was thinking "something I have" as being a public/private key pair for an arguable definition of "have", so when I hit your comma, the confusion was fixed. But now I'm not so sure I was wrong.
I hate having to type my password multiple times in the morning for work, but only partly because of the 2fa on my phone that goes with it. If my computer could just detect my phone being nearby (indicating my presence) that would be great. Then something-I-have would actually out-convenient something-I-know.
Don't push button start cars kinda do this with the key fob? Why are computers lagging behind cars in tech? Usually the other way around.
how are keys more work vs password?
something-you-know auth is generally less work than something-you-have auth, since you need to ensure you always have the key handy whenever you would want to log on.
When I started reading this sentence I thought you had them backwards because I was thinking "something I have" as being a public/private key pair for an arguable definition of "have", so when I hit your comma, the confusion was fixed. But now I'm not so sure I was wrong.
I hate having to type my password multiple times in the morning for work, but only partly because of the 2fa on my phone that goes with it. If my computer could just detect my phone being nearby (indicating my presence) that would be great. Then something-I-have would actually out-convenient something-I-know.
Don't push button start cars kinda do this with the key fob? Why are computers lagging behind cars in tech? Usually the other way around.