Comment by amedvednikov
2 years ago
I'd gladly not waste time by not replying to bait comments spreading debunked claims.
Can these bait comments/threads just be removed to keep HN clean?
2 years ago
I'd gladly not waste time by not replying to bait comments spreading debunked claims.
Can these bait comments/threads just be removed to keep HN clean?
No, we don't do that and the community wouldn't support it.
But you say that flamewars are not wanted, and yet they are allowed to be started by a small number of accounts.
All of the flamewar threads in this post were done by 4 accounts, which follow V posts and my comments, and start the flamewars:
1) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37296225
The comment by riku_iki is spot on: "You are stalking him with toxic attacks on the minor issues which were resolved long ago; I think language which these people are using (scam, outrageous and frequently false claims, lying) is hard to call "mildly critical", and given they appear in multiple posts and their claims are not directly relevant to post, and proactively initiate all these toxic exchanges, this is exactly stalking."
3) richbell, 11 posts.
4) and a couple of new accounts that were thankfully flagged.
I'm not saying that all criticism of V should be flagged, just posts by such accounts, whose only purpose is to start flame wars.
You're doing exactly what I asked you not to do, perpetuating this pointless dispute. It's taking up a ridiculous number of cycles. If this keeps up, we'll ban the topic completely from HN.
My hypothesis is that if you guys stop responding defensively, the problem will simmer down and eventually go away. Stop focusing on criticism. Stop responding to it externally and stop reacting to it internally. Just ignore it. Work on your thing and keep your comments focused on what you've done.
If you want to do that, I'm willing to help you. But you have to actually do it. Responding like this is the opposite.
1 reply →