Comment by brabel

Agreed. Tim was not doing the job of a programmer if he never actually wrote code that delivered value. Tim was a coach. Which is fine if that's what you hired Tim for, but I suspect that if you wanted a coach, you would've hired one. Hard features simply can't be done by juniors even given infinite amounts of time: they just don't have the skills yet, and to gain those skills takes years. Sure, they need a senior to help now and then, but if that makes the senior developers produce nothing, then what's the point for the company?? Just give hard features to people who are senior enough to do them, and if you really want the juniors to learn, let the senior share easier parts of that work (and walk through what he's doing) with the junior.

It's very nice of Tim to help everybody else, but doesn't anybody find it odd that all the other programmers need lots of help in the first place, so much that Tim has zero time to deliver anything himself? Seems that the problem is not with Tim, but with management that thinks it's ok for a professional to need help all the time, and for a volunteer like Tim to be there for them any time regardless of what he's paid for (which in this case, was story points as made clear by the author).