← Back to context Comment by latchkey 3 years ago JMS is a specification, not an implementation. 4 comments latchkey Reply pjmlp 3 years ago Playing pedantic? latchkey 3 years ago Ok, if you can't see what is so great about it, then I'd suggest spending some time in the GCP documentation to figure it out. pjmlp 3 years ago Likewise there are plenty of JMS implementations to play around. 1 reply →
pjmlp 3 years ago Playing pedantic? latchkey 3 years ago Ok, if you can't see what is so great about it, then I'd suggest spending some time in the GCP documentation to figure it out. pjmlp 3 years ago Likewise there are plenty of JMS implementations to play around. 1 reply →
latchkey 3 years ago Ok, if you can't see what is so great about it, then I'd suggest spending some time in the GCP documentation to figure it out. pjmlp 3 years ago Likewise there are plenty of JMS implementations to play around. 1 reply →
Playing pedantic?
Ok, if you can't see what is so great about it, then I'd suggest spending some time in the GCP documentation to figure it out.
Likewise there are plenty of JMS implementations to play around.
1 reply →