Comment by boxed
2 years ago
Here in Sweden I had to watch a video warning against baby shaking when my wife was pregnant with my first child. After seeing this horrible video, I waited a few hours to tell my wife that this entire thing was total bunk, and we've known it's been bunk for many years.
Here in Sweden this child abduction idiocy is upheld by three doctors who all refer to each other as the experts proving baby shaking is real. It's a disgrace.
I've been made to watch a similar video here in The Netherlands. It's not bunk though. Violently shaking a baby will lead to trauma which can cause death. What this book is about is that there are other causes that can lead to the same symptoms. The video is right. Shaking a baby leads to AHT. But the reverse isn't. AHT does not mean that the baby has been shaken. There are many other causes for AHT.
I mean.. sure. But if you shoot a baby it will also harmed. Or stomp on it, or set fire to it.
So, why is this video specifically about shaking? Because of this very specific and narrow conspiracy theory that takes children away from their parents.
Didn't the article state that is actually unlikely it leads to AHT?
I think the article says that shaking a baby will give you lots of different symptoms, including bruises etc. And you can't really get AHT from shaking without also getting bruises etc.
That means if you see 'AHT' without bruises (etc) it was probably not actual shaking.
2 replies →