Comment by dataking
3 years ago
Lots or reporting requirements only take effect once a firm reaches a certain size. This makes a lot of sense given that tiny firms (say less than 10 employees) may not have formalized wage scales, in-house administrative staff, and have a harder time amortizing compliance costs. So yes, there are disadvantages to consider.
Smaller companies can just report whatever they're paying each employee that year, then?
Grandparent poster asked what the disadvantages were. Some employees might not want their personal salary information revealed.
Even the lowest paid employees at the state and federal level already have their pay revealed, and it hasn't caused a problem yet. As far as I know, only orgs like the CIA (and similar) where their employees aren't public are hidden from public view.
4 replies →
I think the legal requirements is declaring pay ranges for which the companies agree to hire (IDK if they must reveal current actual pay). A range can conceal enough for a particular employee not to feel exposed.
Does everyone want their salary even more trivially scraped by Experian and packaged up into a data product?
I'm sure all sorts of entities would like to know exactly what your income is.
2 replies →
I mean they already do?
Publicly and to their employees?