Internet Artifact Museum

2 years ago (neal.fun)

I'm virtually certain the audio clip that plays when you connect to AOL Dial-Up is not a modem from 1991. To my ear it sounds like a 28.8 or 33.6 modem

flips table

@Begin(Comic Book Guy) worst website ever @End

  • Well, it says connected at 52kbps... and the handshake was pretty short, I think it may be a 56k accelerated handshake that could happen if the line characteristics were similar to a previous call. Not sure if that's in all of x2/kflex/v.90/v.92, but it's in some of them.

    • 14.4kbps club, checking in...

      Everything this neal.fun -guy does is golden.

      His last HN forey [password game] left me bureaucratic for weeks.

They should add to the emoji page a blurb about them also being called "emoticons." I remember a big debate about this, and we collectively decided to call them emojis.

Also, the helicopter game was going around on DOS well before 2002. I was playing that around 1993 on a Gateway 386.

After learning that his experiment had gone awry, Morris asked a friend to anonymously relay an apology and instructions for removing the worm to internet users

I'm like 80% sure this friend was Paul Graham.

They are missing Altavista, Stick Figure Death, and a few more.

"The Whitehouse Page"

I had to read that to ensure it was talking about Whitehouse.gov and not Whitehouse.com - the latter of which fooled many-a-schoolteacher in the 90s.

  • I had that thought too! I double checked the URL. I remember my friends trying desperately to convince me to go to the .com and I refused because they were so obviously suspicious.

Please add SomethingAwful and 4chan :)

needs moar yellow van https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkAngvkWVkk

I with the website used proper URLs so it would be possible to use permalinks as a reference for individual items...

> The reaction to the [first spam] email was overwhelmingly negative: one user claimed it broke his computer system, and the US Defense Communications Agency called his company to complain. >>Thuerk claims he sold $13 to $14 million worth of mainframe computers through the campaign<<.

(>>emphasis mine<<)

It was truly a sign of things to come, and an answer to why we can't have nice things.

I hate to be that guy, but the smiley/emoticon was invented on the PLATO platform circa 1972

https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:tPjEJH...

The CDC hardware platform didn't adapt to personal computing architectures, but many of the PLATO alumnus went on to futures with PARC and Apple.

  • This is probably going to spark a dumb argument that's been done to death, but aren't emoticons typographical based? Those look like pictograms or arguably early emoji.

    • They're actually overstrikes of existing characters! The PLATO terminal had some wack stuff built into it, courtesy, I suspect, of the vector buffers it was initially designed with. That kind of computational overhead limited the expansion of the system into commodity equipment, a definite cloud of doom.

      We can really, really go down the rabbit hole with encoding. Wireless morse had several equivalents to "emoticons" in its text encoding, and typesetters had zillions of different emoticons they could and did fabricate. Indeed, these are the first documented examples.

      PLATO is an oddball system, pre-ASCII, pre-everything. That overstrike trick kind of hints at that. So if we mean ASCII-encoded emotions, yeah, PLATO loses to CM's BBS circa 1982.

  • Link broken. But I read about Plato in that book the Happy Orange Glow or something like it. Didn't make it all the way through but it sounded groundbreaking

Man reading through the early 2000s part made me sad. The internet isn’t nearly as fun as it used to be.

When you get to Napster (1999), be sure to interact with it and download a song.

In the middle of the ARPANET map at the beginning, there's a node right in the middle called "SCOTT". I tried Googling for what this node was and didn't come up with much. Why was the node called Scott? Was it run by a guy named Scott? Or is that an acronym for some institution?

If it's a person, how and why did Scott have a PDP-11?

Helicopter game! I'd forgotten about that.

Club Penguin. I was so very very happy when that shut down. I - and others - were doing Support at wordpress.com. Kids (I assume) constantly exploiting other kids to get into their accounts. Kids doing anything to get traffic, using popunder scripts and more.

I love this, plenty of things I'd forgotten about in there presented in a way non-needs like me (us) might appreciate too.

I think there should be an every l entry for ICQ.

Doesn't work on my phone, the top half of the "slides" are cut off. (My phone probably belongs in a museum, though...)

I think HN should come up with its own Internet Artifact Museum :)

I'm happy to collab if folks want to.

Man, I'm really feeling the enshitification of the internet right now. Those early to mid years were great.

Reminds of how slack was/is an IRC clone

  • No not really irc, more of a spiritual descendent of Habitat, and a direct descendent of two other online massively multiplayer games and also Flickr, developed by Stewart Butterfield:

    The Lessons of Lucasfilm's Habitat (1990) (stanford.edu):

    https://www.glitchthegame.com/

    That didn't work out either, so he took the rooms based chat messaging back-end, and pivoted to an app named "Slack".

"In March 1989, Tim Berners-Lee wrote the initial proposal for the World Wide Web, envisioning it as a "universal linked information system" to help researchers share information."

Statement of Facts

Idea: Let's use this system to disseminate advertising.

Idea: Let's use this system to run code automatically on peoples' computers.

Idea: Let's use this system as a means for people to communicate with their family and friends over the internet by uploading their "private" messages to a third party's website.

Idea: ???

Universal linked information system --> universal internet surveillance system

Question

Is the web still suitable to help researchers share information if so-called "tech" companies intermediate access to all information and seek to commercialise all web use.

  • > Is the web still suitable to help researchers share information if so-called "tech" companies intermediate access to all information and seek to commercialise all web use.

    Yes, plenty of researchers share information via the web.

    There was some original vision for the web, and of course that vision has changed in the past 30 years.