← Back to context Comment by Reventlov 2 years ago Yeah, that represent maybe 1% of the packages in nixpkgs (only the installation iso). 1 comment Reventlov Reply chpatrick 2 years ago Sure but the goal is the same, binary reproducibility, and it is systematic. It's just less far along than Debian.Also I'm pretty sure a big percent of nixpkgs is already reproducible, we just don't know for sure.They say the next step might be the GNOME-based ISO, which would be a big achievement because it's basically a full-featured system.
chpatrick 2 years ago Sure but the goal is the same, binary reproducibility, and it is systematic. It's just less far along than Debian.Also I'm pretty sure a big percent of nixpkgs is already reproducible, we just don't know for sure.They say the next step might be the GNOME-based ISO, which would be a big achievement because it's basically a full-featured system.
Sure but the goal is the same, binary reproducibility, and it is systematic. It's just less far along than Debian.
Also I'm pretty sure a big percent of nixpkgs is already reproducible, we just don't know for sure.
They say the next step might be the GNOME-based ISO, which would be a big achievement because it's basically a full-featured system.