← Back to context Comment by saalweachter 2 years ago Mathematics is the study of things you can convince people are true without physical evidence. 5 comments saalweachter Reply adastra22 2 years ago I like this one. Succinct and to the point.However this would also include religion :\ btilly 2 years ago Not if you added "...using only pure logic".Religions do not convince with pure logic. munch117 2 years ago The problem is that now you need to define what "pure logic" is.Here's my definition: Math is the study of intersubjective knowledge. saalweachter 2 years ago Two different religionists can have a conversation and agree on what is true? vlovich123 2 years ago Within the lens of the other religion probably. Except from hardcore zealots, religious people often agree on true things that they find in common between religions (eg idol worship being a sin, murder, adultery, etc etc).
adastra22 2 years ago I like this one. Succinct and to the point.However this would also include religion :\ btilly 2 years ago Not if you added "...using only pure logic".Religions do not convince with pure logic. munch117 2 years ago The problem is that now you need to define what "pure logic" is.Here's my definition: Math is the study of intersubjective knowledge. saalweachter 2 years ago Two different religionists can have a conversation and agree on what is true? vlovich123 2 years ago Within the lens of the other religion probably. Except from hardcore zealots, religious people often agree on true things that they find in common between religions (eg idol worship being a sin, murder, adultery, etc etc).
btilly 2 years ago Not if you added "...using only pure logic".Religions do not convince with pure logic. munch117 2 years ago The problem is that now you need to define what "pure logic" is.Here's my definition: Math is the study of intersubjective knowledge.
munch117 2 years ago The problem is that now you need to define what "pure logic" is.Here's my definition: Math is the study of intersubjective knowledge.
saalweachter 2 years ago Two different religionists can have a conversation and agree on what is true? vlovich123 2 years ago Within the lens of the other religion probably. Except from hardcore zealots, religious people often agree on true things that they find in common between religions (eg idol worship being a sin, murder, adultery, etc etc).
vlovich123 2 years ago Within the lens of the other religion probably. Except from hardcore zealots, religious people often agree on true things that they find in common between religions (eg idol worship being a sin, murder, adultery, etc etc).
I like this one. Succinct and to the point.
However this would also include religion :\
Not if you added "...using only pure logic".
Religions do not convince with pure logic.
The problem is that now you need to define what "pure logic" is.
Here's my definition:
Two different religionists can have a conversation and agree on what is true?
Within the lens of the other religion probably. Except from hardcore zealots, religious people often agree on true things that they find in common between religions (eg idol worship being a sin, murder, adultery, etc etc).