Comment by phendrenad2
2 years ago
You're free to throw away the common-sense definitions for things, and substitute your own, but I'm going to call you on it, and you shouldn't expect people to do otherwise.
2 years ago
You're free to throw away the common-sense definitions for things, and substitute your own, but I'm going to call you on it, and you shouldn't expect people to do otherwise.
I did not throw away any common-sense definitions. I never denied that the message is sent encrypted, i.e. is encrypted in transit. That is entirely irrelevant here though, since MS will be able to decrypt the message because they specifically are the recipient of that encrypted message and therefore will have it in plain text. If you do not see a problem with that you are free to comment your mail credentials here; they will be encrypted so that shouldn't be a problem, right?