Comment by ceejayoz
2 years ago
Not just "above"; US law explicitly gives the President the power to invade The Hague if they get their hands on American officials or military personnel.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Service-Members%27_Pr...
> The Act gives the President power to use "all means necessary and appropriate to bring about the release of any U.S. or allied personnel being detained or imprisoned by, on behalf of, or at the request of the International Criminal Court".
So what? Many countries do not recognize the ICC, not just the US. We don’t want a Global World Order; that’s a European fantasy Europe can keep. We don’t share all the same values or laws and never will.
I’m glad for The Hague Invasion Act.
Doesn't the Hague only do war crimes? It's not much of a Global World Order if they only process heinous stuff. Is this a slippery slope argument? Or do you disagree with how the Hague does things?
am not well educated on it, for context
American money has "NEW WORLD ORDER" written in Latin on it. I'm sure that's where people might get the idea that America does want a Global World Order.
No, it doesn't. "Seclorum" means something like "of the ages" or "for the ages"; it's from the same root as "secular".
If you're going to propagate conspiracy theories, at least try to do so in such fashion as avoids making you look as if you can't be bothered to read.
"Do not recognize" and "explicitly threatens to invade a NATO ally" are not quite the same thing.