← Back to context Comment by izacus 3 years ago This should be a standard consumer protection law (right to repair), not a monopoly thing :/ 4 comments izacus Reply joshuaissac 3 years ago EU consumer protection laws generally do not apply to B2B contracts (although member states can gold-plate them to extend their scope). izacus 3 years ago Sure, but that just means it needs to be adjusted to cover outright sabotage after sale like this. Sosh101 3 years ago More like highly criminal behaviour like fraud and extortion. plagiarist 3 years ago I don't see how it isn't literal fraud if the behavior isn't documented in the purchasing contracts.
joshuaissac 3 years ago EU consumer protection laws generally do not apply to B2B contracts (although member states can gold-plate them to extend their scope). izacus 3 years ago Sure, but that just means it needs to be adjusted to cover outright sabotage after sale like this.
izacus 3 years ago Sure, but that just means it needs to be adjusted to cover outright sabotage after sale like this.
Sosh101 3 years ago More like highly criminal behaviour like fraud and extortion. plagiarist 3 years ago I don't see how it isn't literal fraud if the behavior isn't documented in the purchasing contracts.
plagiarist 3 years ago I don't see how it isn't literal fraud if the behavior isn't documented in the purchasing contracts.
EU consumer protection laws generally do not apply to B2B contracts (although member states can gold-plate them to extend their scope).
Sure, but that just means it needs to be adjusted to cover outright sabotage after sale like this.
More like highly criminal behaviour like fraud and extortion.
I don't see how it isn't literal fraud if the behavior isn't documented in the purchasing contracts.