← Back to context Comment by TomaszZielinski 3 years ago In this case the lower offer was 22mln PLN, whereas the manufacturer's offer was 25mln. 2 comments TomaszZielinski Reply zelon88 3 years ago And if the manufacturer could have justified the additional $3mln in cost besides "vendor lock in" maybe they wouldn't have to break the law to keep customers coming back. TomaszZielinski 3 years ago It's 3mln PLN, so more like $750k... It must have been worth it, right?
zelon88 3 years ago And if the manufacturer could have justified the additional $3mln in cost besides "vendor lock in" maybe they wouldn't have to break the law to keep customers coming back. TomaszZielinski 3 years ago It's 3mln PLN, so more like $750k... It must have been worth it, right?
And if the manufacturer could have justified the additional $3mln in cost besides "vendor lock in" maybe they wouldn't have to break the law to keep customers coming back.
It's 3mln PLN, so more like $750k... It must have been worth it, right?