Comment by throwaway09223
2 years ago
Quite the opposite - it's not only hard it's also unwise.
Admitting that you know that your product may create legal liabilities is not a very smart thing to do.
2 years ago
Quite the opposite - it's not only hard it's also unwise.
Admitting that you know that your product may create legal liabilities is not a very smart thing to do.
You can spin it in a different way:
"We committed to meet all the regulation in each country we're operating in. Our teams are working on it. In the meantime we'll start in our domestic market, because obviously if there has to be a first country to open it would be our origin country, right?"
They could create a separate limited liability legal entity that is a full subsidiary of Google. That subsidiary could license the technology or platform from the parent company and they'd be able to launch worldwide.
This could be an answer to an intent to violate any law.
The counterpoint is that this doesn't actually work in practice.
Well that's Deepmind I guess ?
Did OpenAI ask for permission or forgiveness in that regard?
Did OpenAI board ask for permission or forgiveness? Seems like it was forgiveness and they lost.
If boards cannot hold CEOs accountable then who can?
2 replies →