← Back to context

Comment by jmathai

2 years ago

That example seems a bit hyperbolic. Do you think lawyers who leverage ChatGPT will take the made up cases and present them to a judge without doing some additional research?

What I'm saying is that the tolerance for mistakes is strongly correlated to the value ChatGPT creates. I think both will need to be improved but there's probably more opportunity in creating higher value.

I don't have a horse in the race.

6 comments

jmathai

Reply
anon373839  2 years ago

> Do you think lawyers who leverage ChatGPT will take the made up cases and present them to a judge without doing some additional research

I really don’t recommend using ChatGPT (even GPT-4) for legal research or analysis. It’s simply terrible at it if you’re examining anything remotely novel. I suspect there is a valuable RAG application to be built for searching and summarizing case law, but the “reasoning” ability and stored knowledge of these models is worse than useless.

freejazz  2 years ago

What would be the point of a lawyer using chatGPT if it had to root through every single reference chatGPT relied upon? I don't have to doublecheck every reference of a junior attorney, because they actually know what they are doing, and when they don't, it's easy to tell and wont come with fraudulently created decisions/pleadings, etc

nmfisher  2 years ago

> Do you think lawyers who leverage ChatGPT will take the made up cases and present them to a judge without doing some additional research?

Oh dear.