Comment by fxd123
2 years ago
> which also included a denunciation of the “Zionist ideology which promotes an exclusivist state,”
That's an interesting claim, since Israel is definitely not a exclusivist state. Yet again, 'anti-zionism' seems to be used as a dog whistle for anti-semitism
This article is pretty bad, it screams the typical "jews run the media" trope
The authors also collaborated on an article called 'Moderna is spying on you'. So they are anti-vax conspiracy theorists as well? Yikes
Not an exclusivist state, really? https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/israel-adopts-divisive-la...
Basically every human rights org has come out and declared it an apartheid state based off how non-Jews are treated within Israel proper and in Israeli-occupied territory.
> Although the law is largely symbolic
Then why pass it? Also “largely” is not “altogether.” And a symbolic law speaks to intent, which is embodied in the other not-so-symbolic laws.
What are you referring to? 2 million Arab Israelis enjoy all the rights and freedoms of being an Israeli citizen without any restrictions. They vote, they travel, they are allowed to practice their religion.