Comment by YeBanKo
2 years ago
This article made it to front with 297 pts and generally it negative towards Israel. I don't think any of the articles about Hamas atrocities and their use of social media made to cause panic and fear made it that far on HN.
Back in Oct about a week after the attack Bloomberg 's reporting on the attack and the beginning of the ended up being flagged on NH and only has 23pts: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37910148
It seems that anti-Israel propaganda is way more successful than this pro-Israel information war.
It's easier for anti-Israel propaganda to be more successful here when the people leading Y-Combinator, who own and manage Hacker News, are also anti-Israel, some possibly antisemitic. If it didn't take sides and mandated neutrality, it would flag content from both sides. If a moderator on HN acts out of line with the policy or sentiments of YC leadership, they would be corrected. The battle of ideas begins with who controls the platform and what their policies are.
> some possibly antisemitic
Ah yes, there it is. You didn't even wait untill the second sentence to use this empty term. Because of comments like yours this word completely lost its meaning. Intelligent people just ignore it now.
Not much is known about Hamas propaganda because sharing it is illegal in the USA where YC and HN are based.
On the contrary the IDF is pretty open about its online media budget, spend, and goals. So isn't it natural that people would study it more?
https://www.versobooks.com/blogs/news/social-media-is-a-warz...