Comment by underdeserver
2 years ago
In 1947 there was a British rule. Before that the region was ruled by the Ottomans for some 400 years. Palestinians weren't self-governing at any point before the Oslo accords in the early 90s.
2 years ago
In 1947 there was a British rule. Before that the region was ruled by the Ottomans for some 400 years. Palestinians weren't self-governing at any point before the Oslo accords in the early 90s.
> Before that the region was ruled by the Ottomans for some 400 years.
You don't see how being part of a large, well-regarded Muslim Empire (a true Caliphate) has an effect on the psyche of the largely Muslim Palestinians? Or why they'd be against Western-rule in the post-Ottoman world of 1918+?
I'm certainly not calling the Ottomans saints. But the Ottomans were stewards of the Muslim world for those centuries.
---------
If Britain realized how much trouble all of this Middle Eastern crap would be after the dissolution of the Ottomans, I'm sure they would have rewritten the terms of the Treaty of Sèvres.
I didn't write anything about any effects on their psyche. Just mentioned some facts. The grandparent post had an implicit idea that in 1947 jews suddenly appeared to slice land off a functioning self governing Palestinian state.
Truth is since the Babylonian captivity in the 5th century BCE the area was not ruled by any indigenous people but held by interloping empire after empire, none of which were shy about relocating peoples into and out of that tiny piece of land.
British mandate rule lasted long enough for Irgun and fellow terrorist militias bombing the King David Hotel, attacking Palestinians such that, the British gave up and left.
Are you comparing that to being part of an empire for the preceding 400 years?