You might argue about explicit and implicit, but then...
Israel "ordered" 1.1 million residents of Northern Gaza (Hamas makes up <40,000 people) to flee south due to their bombing of Northern Gaza on October 13.
It then increased bombing of Southern Gaza in the ten days following that evacuation order by eighty five per cent.
You might argue about explicit and implicit, but then...
Israel "ordered" 1.1 million residents of Northern Gaza (Hamas makes up <40,000 people) to flee south due to their bombing of Northern Gaza on October 13.
It then increased bombing of Southern Gaza in the ten days following that evacuation order by eighty five per cent.
That's not "collateral damage".
Source: https://news.sky.com/story/gaza-war-satellite-data-shows-isr...
On what basis does the proportion not matter at all? Do you have a particular ethical justification? A philosophy underpinning this?