← Back to context

Comment by wolverine876

2 years ago

> Israel has been prospering more or less, and of course it's a gamble but that's true either way (for example, there could be better and cheaper missile defense tech coming soon, so the risk of war would be lower)

They constantly say (understandably) how unhappy they are, they are attacked, etc. Look at the current situation. They don't seem satisfied at all.

> it's silly to suffer for so long just due some specific piece of land when you already have land.

That's not why, or not the only reason. The story is that Arafat (Palestine) rejected the two-state (IIRC) resolution in the 1990s, possibly for that reason. But these days the Israelis have opposed a two-state solution for many years.

Also, it's easy to dismiss others' claims.

And the argument is novel in international relations: Do we dismiss China's claim to Taiwan on the basis that China already has (far more) land? Ukraine's claim to their east and south? Etc.

> They constantly say (understandably) how unhappy they are

Israel actually ranks very high in the happiness index, so they are mostly happy, doesn't mean they don't like to complain about stuff.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Happiness_Report#2023_re...

> But these days the Israelis have opposed a two-state solution for many years.

Yeah, which makes me sad. But also i believe the younger palestinains have also moved to the right and are less accepting of a two state solution. That's why you need strong leaders on both sides that aren't just pandering to the people, but are willing to go against the public will - and sadly i don't think we will see such leaders in the current generation (and probably not the next one either)

> And the argument is novel in international relations

Not sure it's very novel, israel's recognized international borders are fairly clear, legally there's just dispute over the west bank and some part of the north, but israel proper isn't disputed.