Comment by fourthark
2 years ago
You implicitly lay responsibility on the worker first, then on the employer, then on the customer.
Perhaps if the order of responsibility were reversed, it would lead to better outcomes.
2 years ago
You implicitly lay responsibility on the worker first, then on the employer, then on the customer.
Perhaps if the order of responsibility were reversed, it would lead to better outcomes.
It would be ridiculous to have any responsibility on the customer.
The only feasible order is government, employer, then worker. The government is tasked with the making the rules and surprise inspections, and the rest follows from there.
Well, the customer also has a lot of power. They can decide to hire a company (if available of course) that encourages/forces their workers to use PPE, even if it's a little more expensive (and maybe also takes longer) instead of just going for the lowest bidder...
How would a customer verify that? They are supposed to also monitor the worksite? And be knowledgeable about consistent work and the type of PPE it requires?
4 replies →