In almost all Spiritual/Religious teachings - they say "The only constant in the universe is change" - so Its kind of banal to say "Scientists who studied the rivers simply allot it to Climate Change" as if its the profundity of Science here...
I guess you missed I was pointing to that they put in a whole bunch of meat in the article about the apparent study and they boil it down to a very simple conclusion of "climate change"?
That's not banal? (im not being flippant - I just thought the conclusion was weak, and didnt feel like I learned much.
In almost all Spiritual/Religious teachings - they say "The only constant in the universe is change" - so Its kind of banal to say "Scientists who studied the rivers simply allot it to Climate Change" as if its the profundity of Science here...
If `cl` is the climate change function then Climate Change really specifically is referring to the derivative of `cl` right now.
Probably orders of magnitude less banal than your comments here on it.
I guess you missed I was pointing to that they put in a whole bunch of meat in the article about the apparent study and they boil it down to a very simple conclusion of "climate change"?
That's not banal? (im not being flippant - I just thought the conclusion was weak, and didnt feel like I learned much.
1 reply →