I guess you missed I was pointing to that they put in a whole bunch of meat in the article about the apparent study and they boil it down to a very simple conclusion of "climate change"?
That's not banal? (im not being flippant - I just thought the conclusion was weak, and didnt feel like I learned much.
I guess you missed I was pointing to that they put in a whole bunch of meat in the article about the apparent study and they boil it down to a very simple conclusion of "climate change"?
That's not banal? (im not being flippant - I just thought the conclusion was weak, and didnt feel like I learned much.
What makes you guess that?