Comment by walterbell
1 year ago
Would a self-hosted private instance of Nitter be an option to avoid rate limits, or are Twitter accounts being penalized for using any third-party API client?
1 year ago
Would a self-hosted private instance of Nitter be an option to avoid rate limits, or are Twitter accounts being penalized for using any third-party API client?
You could, but you'd have to make your own personal twitter account. At that point you're using Twitter with extra steps.
For those who need timely access to information that is only available on Twitter, the account is unavoidable.
The benefit of extra steps is a client under user control, e.g. filtering, RSS, better threading and more.
If timely is the key criterion isn’t sticking a caching layer in the middle the opposite of helping?
1 reply →
yes but those extra steps make the difference. those extra steps are the entire point. The difference between using the blessed client and using a preferred client that previously accessed the platform via an API is those steps!
RSS!