Comment by dang
1 year ago
> There are several low-point, long-lived but highly ranked unnatural posts on the top page that appear to be manipulated.
Which are they? It's important to include links so that (a) we can say what's going on, and (b) so readers can make up their own minds.
You might be talking about stories that went in to the second-chance pool (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26998308), which get a random placement on HN's front page.
If you don't know it could be a bug. Next time I find it, I will report it.
I have heard that sometimes the submission time is reset, such as when returning from the second chance pool. This could also create an unnatural ranking order, so the original time before the reset should be listed as well.
It could certainly be a bug! but it could also be a lot of other things.
Yes, the timestamp munging is an artifact of HN's re-upping system, described at https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que....
The original times are always available because the modified time is used only on the frontpage and the article's /item page. If you find the article on /from or /submitted, for example, the timestamp will be the original. The two timestamps converge over time.
Can you also list the original times on the front page for consistency in rankings?
2 replies →