← Back to context

Comment by vonjuice

2 years ago

Just want to highlight that the way you phrased it, someone doing 99% harm and providing 1% value can be said to be providing value.

I consider it a trivial lemma of the concepts of harm and value, that something which is causing more harm than they are creating value, is producing net negative value.

Although you gave me an opportunity to clarify that, which isn't nothing, I suppose.