Comment by smitty1e
2 years ago
My funny story is built on the idea that AWS is Hotel California for your data.
A customer had an interest in merging the data from an older account into a new one, just to simplify matters. Enterprise data. Going back years. Not even leaving the region.
The AWS rep in the meeting kinda pauses, says: "We'll get back to you on the cost to do that."
The sticker shock was enough that the customer simply inherited the old account, rather than making things tidy.
Is R2 a sensible option for hosting data? I understand egress is chesp.
R2 is great. Our GCS bill (almost all egress) jumped from a few hundred dollars a month to a couple thousand dollars a month last year due to a usage spike. We rush-migrated to R2 and now that part of the bill is $0.
I've heard some people here on HN say that it's slow, but I haven't noticed a difference. We're mainly dealing with multi-megabyte image files, so YMMV if you have a different workload.
awesome. I remember reading about this a while ago, but never tried. Since it has the same API i can imagine its not daunting as a multi-cloud infrastructure.
I guess permissions might be more complex, as in EC2 instance profiles wouldnt grant access, etc.
1 reply →
Eh? I've never had a problem moving data out of AWS.
Have people lost the ability to write export and backup scripts?
My (peripheral) experience is that it is much cheaper to get data in than to get data out. When you have the amount of data being discussed — "Enterprise data. Going back years." — that can get very costly.
It's the amount of data where it makes more sense to put hard drives on a truck and drive across the country rather than send it over a network, where this becomes an issue (actually, probably a bit before then).
AWS actually has a service for this - Snowmobile, a storage datacenter inside of a shipping container, which is driven to you on a semi truck. https://aws.amazon.com/snowmobile/
3 replies →
Just in network costs, there's a huge asymmetry. Uploading data to AWS is free. Downloading data from them, you have to pay.
When you have enough data, that cost is quite significant.
The ingress/egress cost is ridiculously high. Some companies don't care, but it is there and I've seen it catch people off guard multiple times.
Oh come on from the description both accounts could be sitting on the same datacenter LAN.
There's a cost for data egress (but not ingress)
It’s the cost of data egress, which isn’t free.
But there is no paid egress when we are moving data between account within one region, rigth?
2 replies →