Comment by albertzeyer
2 years ago
So, what does the author actually wants from the licence?
Is it ok that other people take the code, modify it but don't open the modifications? If not, then GPL or AGPL. If you want that they can still build sth around it, but otherwise not modifying your library, then LGPL.
Or is this ok, but the main issue is no attribution to the original source? BSD licence maybe? Or Apache? Or what else?
> If you want that they can still build sth around it, but otherwise not modifying your library, then LGPL.
They can modify the library under LGPL, they just have to redistribute the source for those modifications under LGPL also