← Back to context Comment by fsflover 2 years ago The parent is right: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39414322 5 comments fsflover Reply growse 2 years ago No, they're not. It's a pretty long stretch from IP traffic analysis to "who's talking to whom". fsflover 2 years ago Not for Amazon I would guess. See also: https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=autoexec&next=394457... growse 2 years ago > Not for Amazon I would guessIf you're worried about Signal's hosting provider seeing your device's IP address, use a proxy. Personally, I'm not, because there's no trivial way to go from "Here's some IP traffic" to "this human had a conversation with this human".> See also: https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=autoexec&next=394457...I also hand BitWarden all my passwords. Therefore, the government has them, right? 1 reply → egberts1 2 years ago Court requires "what was said" for evidence as in old telcom CALEA, whereas Signal via sealed sender basically guarantees the "Spirit of CALEA".
growse 2 years ago No, they're not. It's a pretty long stretch from IP traffic analysis to "who's talking to whom". fsflover 2 years ago Not for Amazon I would guess. See also: https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=autoexec&next=394457... growse 2 years ago > Not for Amazon I would guessIf you're worried about Signal's hosting provider seeing your device's IP address, use a proxy. Personally, I'm not, because there's no trivial way to go from "Here's some IP traffic" to "this human had a conversation with this human".> See also: https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=autoexec&next=394457...I also hand BitWarden all my passwords. Therefore, the government has them, right? 1 reply → egberts1 2 years ago Court requires "what was said" for evidence as in old telcom CALEA, whereas Signal via sealed sender basically guarantees the "Spirit of CALEA".
fsflover 2 years ago Not for Amazon I would guess. See also: https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=autoexec&next=394457... growse 2 years ago > Not for Amazon I would guessIf you're worried about Signal's hosting provider seeing your device's IP address, use a proxy. Personally, I'm not, because there's no trivial way to go from "Here's some IP traffic" to "this human had a conversation with this human".> See also: https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=autoexec&next=394457...I also hand BitWarden all my passwords. Therefore, the government has them, right? 1 reply → egberts1 2 years ago Court requires "what was said" for evidence as in old telcom CALEA, whereas Signal via sealed sender basically guarantees the "Spirit of CALEA".
growse 2 years ago > Not for Amazon I would guessIf you're worried about Signal's hosting provider seeing your device's IP address, use a proxy. Personally, I'm not, because there's no trivial way to go from "Here's some IP traffic" to "this human had a conversation with this human".> See also: https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=autoexec&next=394457...I also hand BitWarden all my passwords. Therefore, the government has them, right? 1 reply →
egberts1 2 years ago Court requires "what was said" for evidence as in old telcom CALEA, whereas Signal via sealed sender basically guarantees the "Spirit of CALEA".
No, they're not. It's a pretty long stretch from IP traffic analysis to "who's talking to whom".
Not for Amazon I would guess. See also: https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=autoexec&next=394457...
> Not for Amazon I would guess
If you're worried about Signal's hosting provider seeing your device's IP address, use a proxy. Personally, I'm not, because there's no trivial way to go from "Here's some IP traffic" to "this human had a conversation with this human".
> See also: https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=autoexec&next=394457...
I also hand BitWarden all my passwords. Therefore, the government has them, right?
1 reply →
Court requires "what was said" for evidence as in old telcom CALEA, whereas Signal via sealed sender basically guarantees the "Spirit of CALEA".