Comment by dequan
1 year ago
"outdated article" the commit tested is 3 months old.
This is a standard V community tactic: all negative feedback is "bashing", anything older than a week is "outdated", anything up to date shouldn't have been written and posted on the issue tracker to be ignored instead.
Stop trying to control everyone else's speech and just work on fixing the long list of issues folks already took the time to report.
[flagged]
From the article:
> Everything described here is correct for the b66447cf11318d5499bd2d797b97b0b3d98c3063 commit. This is a summary of my experience with the language over 6 months + information that I found on Discord while I was writing this article.
From https://github.com/vlang/v/commit/b66447cf11318d5499bd2d797b...:
> felipensp committed Nov 20, 2023
Can you clarify how you're calculating 2 years? Today is February 24, 2024, so the parent comment saying 3 months seems pretty accurate.
I'm guessing they didn't look at the article and assumed it was the older one. There is a similar one from two years ago: https://mawfig.github.io/2022/06/18/v-lang-in-2022.html
2 replies →