← Back to context Comment by F3nd0 3 years ago Seems entirely reasonable, considering that <img> is for images, whereas mp4 is for videos, no? 1 comment F3nd0 Reply account42 3 years ago Doesn't make sense when they support GIF or animated WebP as images. Animated WebP in particular is just a purposely gimped WebM that should not exist at all and would not need to exist if we could use video files directly.
account42 3 years ago Doesn't make sense when they support GIF or animated WebP as images. Animated WebP in particular is just a purposely gimped WebM that should not exist at all and would not need to exist if we could use video files directly.
Doesn't make sense when they support GIF or animated WebP as images. Animated WebP in particular is just a purposely gimped WebM that should not exist at all and would not need to exist if we could use video files directly.