Yes, this is pretty much just pseudo-statistical nonsense. Its like it is taken right from the playbook of Trump’s election denial or a fringe Climate change denial. The graphs show limited data which doesn’t actually indicated what they say it indicates. Speculations are drawn without any justification for doing so, and the conclusion has nothing to do with presiding arguments raised.
yes. it doesn't fit the narrative
Yes, this is pretty much just pseudo-statistical nonsense. Its like it is taken right from the playbook of Trump’s election denial or a fringe Climate change denial. The graphs show limited data which doesn’t actually indicated what they say it indicates. Speculations are drawn without any justification for doing so, and the conclusion has nothing to do with presiding arguments raised.
I think it raises valid questions, can you elaborate what's wrong with the article?
4 replies →