Comment by dmitrygr
2 years ago
My theory: the problem is iCloud encryption at rest. The solution is to hang this over Apple until they relent.
2 years ago
My theory: the problem is iCloud encryption at rest. The solution is to hang this over Apple until they relent.
If that were the case, why wouldn’t Apple come out and say this is what is happening?
Same reason you don’t go to the cops when the mafia extorts you - it will only make it worse.
But Apple did go public when the FBI was bothering them. They aren’t a little shop.
I agree with this wholeheartedly. The USA is a surveillance state and Apple’s security posture combined with its market share is a considerable hindrance. The arguments against anti-competitive and consumer-hostile mechanisms ad nauseam pale in comparison to this. I very much want to see real numbers, perhaps survey data, supporting the narrative that customers are locked in, unhappy with their experience, or otherwise underserved by Apple. Because IRL, I see nothing but happy customers.
The majority of people I see complaining about apple’s walled garden ecosystem are people who are also proud to admit they don’t use apple products. It’s never made sense to me why people who don’t even use the products care so much about it. If people wanted to be able to do the things they claim they want to, they would switch to android but they don’t.
I have never understood the inverse: Apple users defending their lack of features. Being able to send iMessages to your Android user friends or install software that you wrote without paying extra would only benefit you, yet you vehemently reject having the ability to do so for no apparent reason. "Security" is the word I see thrown around which doesn't make too much sense to me given that you can do all these things and be secure already on basically any desktop environment. What makes phones the special exception? Is phone architecture exceptionally insecure by default or something?
6 replies →
This is basically the only actual reason for the suit.