Comment by emodendroket
2 years ago
I agree and I question the wisdom of it, but the idea of this aggressive antitrust enforcement, which so far has more strikes than hits, seems to be to make a grinding, years- (or even decades-) long push to shift the understanding of what antitrust is and make major changes to the landscape; kind of an inverse of what the conservatives have been able to do with various issues, where their positions were initially laughed out of the room but now have the weight of Supreme Court decisions behind them decades later.
I think you're right: https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/whats-coming-in-2024-on-t...
Matt Stoller and Lina Khan run in the same circles so, yes, probably what he writes is a reasonable proxy for what she thinks.
>> I question the wisdom of it, but the idea of this aggressive antitrust enforcement, which so far has more strikes than hits
We only really take these up when they are blatant (price fixing, apple and books, MS and vendors). Or lock ins where there is NO alternative (MS and browsers). This doesn't really meet those bars.
If Apple wins this one at home, then they can quickly cry about other countries regulations being "anti competitive".
I have to wonder if this political on some level.
> We only really take these up when they are blatant (price fixing, apple and books, MS and vendors).
Not anymore... look at the failed action to stop MS acquiring Activision for instance. Was that "blatant"? I guess not since enforcement failed. Lina Khan's whole thing is aggressively broadening antitrust enforcement.