Comment by ripdog
2 years ago
By default was missing from the sentence. You can do it with Whatsapp etc, but both you and the other party need to download a 3rd party app to do so.
2 years ago
By default was missing from the sentence. You can do it with Whatsapp etc, but both you and the other party need to download a 3rd party app to do so.
> By default was missing from the sentence. You can do it with Whatsapp etc, but both you and the other party need to download a 3rd party app to do so.
So... what?
It's an obvious abuse of their monopoly to suppress competition. Most kids use iPhone and for the general public in the US iPhone has >50% market share, so to expect most people to stop using iMessage to get better support with Android users is not happening, and it's silly to think that will change without a change in laws, so most kids end up getting iPhones so they're not left out.
Remember, this is all a very arbitrary restriction by Apple that lets them take advantage of their monopoly to suppress sales of competitive products. That's the illegal part.
> It's an obvious abuse of their monopoly to suppress competition.
Apple has a monopoly on what, exactly?
Let me answer. Apple has a monopoly on iPhones.
Just like Chevy has a monopoly on Corvettes and Ford has a monopoly on Mustangs.
> Remember, this is all a very arbitrary restriction by Apple
What are they restricting? I am still unclear. Their choosing not to do something is not restricting anything.
> that lets them take advantage of their monopoly to suppress sales of competitive products.
And we're right again back to them having a monopoly on iPhones.
2 replies →
2.6 billion WhatsApp users exist. All switched from native SMS to a third-party app (WhatsApp). Clearly this expectation is fine.
8 replies →
I think the point is that it's kind not entirely accurate to say that Apple doesn't allow messaging interoperability with Android. They in-fact do through dozens of available third party apps. They don't allow non-apple devices to implement the iMessage protocol, which could be argued to be anti-consumer but it's not really evidence of apple being a monopoly.
Edit: Just realized that you I misread your comment and you and I agree