Comment by munchler
2 years ago
So because phones are useful, lock-in should be prohibited? I don’t think that’s how the law reads. Should we also prevent lock-in for car parts, because there are infinite places to go in cars?
2 years ago
So because phones are useful, lock-in should be prohibited? I don’t think that’s how the law reads. Should we also prevent lock-in for car parts, because there are infinite places to go in cars?
> Should we also prevent lock-in for car parts, because there are infinite places to go in cars?
...yes. Of course we should protect the personal transportation of hundreds of millions of Americans. And we do via the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act.
In the same way, of course we should protect the primary form factor of personal computer for roughly a hundred of million Americans.