Comment by devit
2 years ago
This is a really bizarre viewpoint.
In my view, my phone is MY DEVICE. It is most definitely not "Google/Apple's platform"!
Google is merely manufacturing my phone, and I intend Google to have no rights or control whatsoever regarding my phone, and merely have the obligation (not right, obligation) to manufacture it correctly and provide open-source software for it that works correctly and properly provides Android interfaces (obviously, I don't use an Apple phone since Apple doesn't offer that, while Google does since they provide devices with unlocked bootloaders that run open-source OSes).
It only runs Android because Google with Android happened to win the adoption lottery and it would run PodunkOS by ACME if PodunkOS by ACME had been the one that managed to gain critical mass.
Again it is absolutely not even remotely close to "Google/Apple's platform", and I have no intention for Google to interfere in my use of it and certainly not interfere in any relations I might have with people providing software for my phone like taking a cut of the transaction or deciding how that software should behave.
Normal people don't think that deeply about it or understand even 10% of the terms you just reeled out.
I'm talking about the normal persons perception of the situation, not what is right in terms of how a technically savvy person would look at the situation.
It's pretty simple: "it's my phone, I do what I want with it, just like my house or car".
Which includes "go to any website and run any app I can download from it, regardless of whether it's illegal or against any rules or against the interests of the phone maker" and "change any aspect of functionality that I don't like (e.g. apps being able to show ads) and that I can find out on the web how to change".
It doesn't include "Google or Apple make rules about what I can do with my phone that I can't override".