← Back to context

Comment by zer00eyz

2 years ago

Right... defamation is a good analog for this. Its under AIR21...

This case was him suing Boeing for money. The claim was that his whistleblowing was the reason he didn't get promoted and was forced to retire early. Thats whistleblowing past tense, the FAA already said the things he was whistleblowing on were in fact true, and Boeing was at fault.

He had lost this case once, but his lawyers felt that he could win this 2nd time around as there was a preponderance of evidence. The table stakes for this were in the 10's of millions at best, a trivial sum of money.

>>> I am not saying your wrong but who were the faulty suppliers for all these claims?

It was all, already, long ago, unraveled:

https://archive.is/iUzxR#selection-1111.393-1111.775

Its not opening but I appreciate you adding other info to the conversation. Do you think as the trial proceeds we will gain new information?