← Back to context Comment by talldayo 2 years ago > Why is it barbarism?Because the civilian death toll far outweighs the militant casualties? 3 comments talldayo Reply KikoHeit 2 years ago [flagged] oa335 2 years ago Hamas’s Oct 7th attack also had a 2:1 civilian to soldier death ratio, so about the same as this “most efficient urban war in history”.“The latest death toll from the attack is now 767 civilians, 20 hostages and 376 members of the security forces, giving a total of 1,163. One person remains missing.” https://www.barrons.com/news/new-tally-puts-october-7-attack... justin66 2 years ago Wow, I've seen that a few times. That opinion piece really did its job.
KikoHeit 2 years ago [flagged] oa335 2 years ago Hamas’s Oct 7th attack also had a 2:1 civilian to soldier death ratio, so about the same as this “most efficient urban war in history”.“The latest death toll from the attack is now 767 civilians, 20 hostages and 376 members of the security forces, giving a total of 1,163. One person remains missing.” https://www.barrons.com/news/new-tally-puts-october-7-attack... justin66 2 years ago Wow, I've seen that a few times. That opinion piece really did its job.
oa335 2 years ago Hamas’s Oct 7th attack also had a 2:1 civilian to soldier death ratio, so about the same as this “most efficient urban war in history”.“The latest death toll from the attack is now 767 civilians, 20 hostages and 376 members of the security forces, giving a total of 1,163. One person remains missing.” https://www.barrons.com/news/new-tally-puts-october-7-attack...
[flagged]
Hamas’s Oct 7th attack also had a 2:1 civilian to soldier death ratio, so about the same as this “most efficient urban war in history”.
“The latest death toll from the attack is now 767 civilians, 20 hostages and 376 members of the security forces, giving a total of 1,163. One person remains missing.” https://www.barrons.com/news/new-tally-puts-october-7-attack...
Wow, I've seen that a few times. That opinion piece really did its job.