Comment by alilleybrinker
7 months ago
Since they actually make a product using their patented technology, they would definitionally not be a patent troll. Even if they’re litigious, that’s exactly how the system is supposed to work when you’ve invented a valuable technology which you sell to recoup the costs of R&D plus the profit of your invention.
> Since they actually make a product
At the time they were up to their original shenanigans they did not sell the saw. They did not sell a saw for the first five years of their business being open. It was a pure IP play. God damn do people have short memories.
Maybe that's a reasonable timeframe to go from patent to selling it? I imagine there's a few things that can go between those, like tests on the patented prototype, designing how it'll be mass produced, mass producing it, distribution & storage, etc.
No. Their original saw was derived from a design that their OEM was already producing. All of this was well documented and well covered by various outlets at the time including Slashdot and Groklaw; please stop with the absurd speculation. SawStop was an IP troll. Whether they still are or not, I do not know, but the current situation sure smells funny. I am not at all convinced that their efforts to invite regulation is altruistic *even if* it actually improves saw safety.