Comment by luma
7 months ago
Arguing that your technology should be required by law, while offering a performative release of one patent (which is absolutely not enough to cover a working implementation), is the dictionary definition of bad faith. You don't have to go any further than the linked article for evidence of how this guy has acted throughout his entire career.
You're arguing in a circle.
"The reason why he shouldn't be trusted here is because he's done things in bad faith in the past"
"What has he done in bad faith in the past"
Your assertion "He's doing so in bad faith right there".
You can't also attempt to conclude your antecedent from your consequent.